Conflict ensued as Helleck claimed that, because the MNN is a public network, they are required to uphold everyone's freedom of speech equally. On the other hand, MNN claimed that they are not a "state actor," and therefore do not have to do so.
This conflict of public versus private and how that corresponds to the First Amendment is something that transcends just public television. As the article mentions, these ideas can transfer into our discussions about social media platforms and more. In any case, this SCOTUS case will perhaps set a precedent for future First Amendment debates.
That's all for now!
That's all for now!
No comments:
Post a Comment